ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black

SKU: EN-X10475

ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black

ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black

ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black

Samsung, meanwhile, isn't best pleased, and says the verdict will hurt the consumer in the end. We've got both statements in full after the break. Apple's CEO Tim Cook, celebrating his first anniversary as head of the company, had this to say. "We are grateful to the jury for their service and for investing the time to listen to our story and we were thrilled to be able to finally tell it. The mountain of evidence presented during the trial showed that Samsung's copying went far deeper than even we knew. The lawsuits between Apple and Samsung were about much more than patents or money. They were about values.

"Consumers have the right to choices, and they know what they are buying when they purchase Samsung products, This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple's claims, Samsung will continue to innovate and offer choices for the consumer."Which do you think is closer to the truth? Let me know in the comments, or on our Facebook page, Apple says the verdict sends a "loud and clear message that copying is wrong", while Samsung thinks customers are ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black the ones who'll suffer..

The jury also rejected every one of Samsung's patent claims, and found the Korean company had breached US antitrust law by trying to keep its wireless patents as a monopoly. So what does this mean for the world of tech?. Apple originally asked for $2.75bn in damages. While the jury didn't agree on all counts, the verdict was only in Apple's favour. Samsung will have to pay Apple damages of $1,049,393,540. It won't receive a penny in return, as every one of its counter-accusations were quashed. The Korean company was seeking $421m.

This hearing was scheduled more than three weeks away to give Samsung "maximum time", according to Koh, Expect Apple to go all-out, asking for as many products as possible to be banned, And based on the outcome of the trial, it could well succeed, The jury returned the verdict quicker than expected -- one Apple lawyer came into the court in his civvies, he was so unprepared, Should it have all gone ted baker colin iphone x mirror folio case - tranquillity black Apple's way? Should Samsung devices be banned? Or is the whole trial misguided? Let me know what you reckon in the comments, or on Facebook..

Apple has won its patent case against Samsung, with a jury in California awarding more than $1bn in damages. The result is in! It's taken four weeks of legal tussles in the court room, and two and a half days of deliberation (involving sifting through hundreds of pages of documents), but the jury has found Samsung guilty of copying the iPhone and iPad, and awarded Apple over $1bn. Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion.